'It’s a Good Life vs Twilight Zone Essay\r'

'After analyze the fable â€Å"It’s A Good spirit” by Jerome Bixby to the movie adaptation of decline Zone, I found many differences in each account. In Jerome Bixby’s variate, Anthony is a 3 course senior little boy. He has purple eyes, and is a wildcat with godlike powers. He can transform plurality and objects into anything that he wants, and he can read others minds. In this story, Anthony does not speak until the very end. Anthony plays with a rat during the story. He is bored from playing with it, so he makes the rat eat itself.\r\nAt the end of the story, Anthony move Dan into a creepy object and wishes him into the cornfield. In the twilight(prenominal) Zone, Anthony is portrayed as a six year old little boy. He has blue eyes, quite of purple. He is a monster with godlike powers, also. He controls and destroys the things around him whenever he wants. Anthony speaks throughout the entire suppress version. He creates a three-headed animal that he plays with during the crepuscle Zone. At the end of the episode, Anthony turns Dan into a jack-in-the-box.\r\nSome structural differences between the two accounts is the dialogue of Anthony. In the story, he does not speak until the very end. In Twilight Zone, he talks throughout the entire episode. The secrete version of â€Å"It’s A Good keep” is more effective. It keeps the audience’s attention, and it is more appealing. The story version does not hold the audience’s attention throughout the entire story. The screen version includes more details and is more in-depth than Jerome Bixby’s version.\r\n'