Happiness Emotion Essay

Happiness is an emotion and feeling of contentednessment, gladness and pleasure. In some instances it whitethorn be in our power or in some a nonher(prenominal) cases it whitethorn non be. Feeling of happiness is a transitory branch however, it backside call on into a long-term state when we and our surroundings continuously adopt those practices that cause happiness and pleasure. Maslow talked about long-term happiness. It corporation be subjective happiness or prey happiness. Maslow belief was on objective happiness. In the state of happiness our take in self-deception plays a zippy portion. One shadow think of being bright when hes non or angiotensin converting enzymeness can be happy and content and non aw atomic number 18 of this state.Some philosophers vox populi that the state of being happy is completely below our control. We can choose to be happy or not. The power of being happy or unhappy is a state of mind. Because some plurality are happy over one thing, while opposites feel just the opposite of the same thing. It depends on our day-to-day habits and practices. But Maslow believed that happiness is to micturate a good pleasurable liveliness that one can achieve with his full potential. He thinks one can be happy when one is living a high-quality good life. correspond to Csikszentmihalyi, the philosophy of happiness in sympathetic society has always been under great controversies and discussions. Human brutality, war and conflict have caused great destiny of violence, aggression and miseries in the society. Prevailing happiness in the society is not an easy task. It would require improving our relations with another(prenominal)s. This includes all kinds of relations, relations betwixt the nations, between divergent ethnic groups, between different cultures and societies. Developing alliance with others need changing our attitudes. A conflict starts when our attitude and doings is not good with others. Keeping good a ttitude and behaving with others gently will entirely cause happiness to prevail.Harshness, brutality, rudeness, and aggressive attitude give rise to conflict, aversion and eventually war. For maintaining happiness in the society, it is not only primary(prenominal) to cleanse our attitudes but to protect them and promote them to guard happiness. Happiness constitutes when all rights of masses are protected and they get justice when harm is done to them. Philosophers fasten happiness as not just the end of conflict but its a continuous process of developing relationships and promoting good behavior. Csikszentmihalyi gives broader view of happiness with respect to its existence and out ejaculates in history. He analyses how the aggression has existed in society and how happiness had evolved and been affective in prevailing tranquility in the society.Happiness exists in our feelings when our behavior inspires courteousness, roll in the hay of neighborhood, sympathy, charity, if combined, defeat poverty, discrimination, abuse and other abhorrence attitudes. Trust in organized religion can overcome hatred & disgust, while it ends discrimination and does not foster inequity but love. Hurting, destroying and harming others spread out pain. However, love halts this devastation and ends pain. The demands of nurturing and sustaining much(prenominal) love are genuinely high. abide by for religion inspires.According to Csikszentmihalyi, a happy meaningful life exponent be different in views of different community depending upon the achievements in different areas, which cover happiness, wealth, richness, wellness, love, marriage, family & relations. However, apart from these, there are spiritual and existential involve that give meaning to life. The desire to attain this meaning is not complete or overcome by relative meanings, but this comes by net gift. The hiter is limited to specific realm of meaning, while later is permanent, some(prenominal) we a ttain meaninglessness continues.Our moral responsibility is the necessity and our actions take subside from our determination and our own choice. For this we are tone ending to answer in the hereafter about our whole kit. If our deeds are according to beau ideals impartiality and His ism then we may be rewarded by Him but if our deeds are in rejection to what God created as norms of life then we can be punished by Him.A voluntary act differs from a non-voluntary one in that first one has self-conscious advertence (to turn ones attention to) to that particular action and self-choice for own causality. It has a choice that the act has been chosen by ones own awareness. Thoughtful ideas and volition consciously started, but later continued just spontaneously, without reflective advertence remains throw in because there was a free choice for bringing it about by elective adoption.Lyubomirsky states that everything, which is going on in the world, is the result of some previous event, or events. Therefore, everything that exists is already in pre- throttled or pre-existent state and, hence, nothing new can come into existence. This holds the view that every event is simply the result of past events. This, in turn, has deep and radical effects on morality, science, and religion. According to the view of Lyubomirsky anything which is going to happen in the future is unalterable and is caused by prior events. It concludes that human freedom is an illusion.Free will is opposite to what determinism is, it is non-determination and freedom. The conscious of man are free to bump off genuine undetermined choices. Free will comes in a variety of oddballs and strengths. Lyubomirsky states determination contradict free will and doctrine that it does not exist, because all events, are causally determined. so, our will can determine our happiness.This view shows that were in a system of split, and strengthens the view compositional happiness, as commonly view by Chr istian complementariness in symmetry with naturalist. According to Maslow, to build a system with happiness we must do a physical or biological structure, and to successfully build such(prenominal) system, a mental life would emerge in that system.In accept of this view, another philosopher suggests that to have a happy life means to have any peculiar kind of physical and emotional system. Philosophers assert that a person is system of material made up of different parts ordered in appropriate pattern. Thus, happiness may or may not be under our control. It some situations we can do things to make ourselves happy or at other times it may come without alarming.If existence is not taken into the meanings of a prosperous-being then, a society can exist without security, education and rules. But a society can never stand without any health. These three basic things are regarded as the very fundamental human rights namely security, education and health. The absence of the first ii destroys the society as a whole but do not interfere with the individuals in a very direct way, but the absence of the third one destroys the entities of that society-the human beings itself. So health is the fundamental give away that a society has to care for.A society is said to exist on three main beams, Security of individuals, Education and health. Poor health conditions could affect the society in a way that even the other two collectively can not do. Nothing is more concerning to a person more than his health. Health is no doubt a basic human right. This basic right of an individual is the duty of a government. barely healthier persons can contribute effectively towards a productive society. morality inspires courteousness, love of neighborhood, sympathy, charity, if combined, defeat poverty, discrimination, abuse and other hatred attitudes. Trust in religion can overcome hatred & disgust, while it ends discrimination and does not foster inequity but love. Hurting, destroy ing and harming others spread pain. However, love halts this devastation and ends pain. The demands of nurturing and sustaining such love are very high. Respect for religion inspires civility of love for humanity, inspires people to trust, pray, and work diligently for a world where all people are respected.According to Lyubomirsky & Sheldon religion, especially monotheism, where God is the sole point of idolisation creates a direct relationship of man with God. Lyubomirsky & Sheldons writing has greatly been influenced by cosmological religiosity from in a sense though he is unable to do so as it largely relates to emotions, behavior and psychological health. He relates cosmological religiosity with human powers of love, emotions, feelings, and value as it is associated with the field of withdraw of soul. He stresses that cosmological religiosity is not a apparitional connotation but a science to deal with mental process in health and illness. For him, conscious and unconsciou s thought is not the matter of belief in God or not to believe in Him but about humanistic view of religion, his attitude, behavior and relationship with people and a positive attitude towards the society.But this humanistic definition of religion doesnt actually encompass religious connotations. Though, in defining tyrannical view of religion, he is correct to some extent, where monotheism is regarded the only true form of religion while all other are deviation from this truth, he hasnt yet been able to grasp the actual meaning of religion, its important role in mans life and in his study of mind. In monotheism only one power, God, dominates, who has to be followed and respected with submission.However, he regards this type of submission as self-destruction. Here Lyubomirsky & Sheldon is proposing an incorrect view of submission to God as self-destruction, because history and facts show that this is the only way of developing a true and loving behavior with the Creator and the His creatures. The form of religion he states right i.e. humanistic, is actually not humanistic but self-indulgence and it simply leads one to love his society and people but persons life keeps revolving around himself without realization of duty-bound to his responsibilities and right of God and His people.Hence the three articles conclude about different views of happiness. Happiness lies in ones inner-self and how we view outside world. Our personality and psychology plays vital role that how we perceive certain things as good for us and some as bad.ReferencesA Theory of Human Motivation by MaslowIf We Are So Rich, Why Arent We Happy? by Csikszentmihalyi Pursuing Happiness by Lyubomirsky, Sheldon, and Schakade.